Skip to main content

Topics

This section allows you to view all Topics made by this member. Note that you can only see Topics made in areas you currently have access to.

Topics - Admin

1
Links / RIGHTEOUS SITES OF NOTE
RIGHTEOUS SITES OF NOTE
    [/font][/size][/color][/list]
    2
    Video / From Lou on Facebook
    Please feel free to comment on posts that you can see or join yourself to a limited members only group and see more.
    This small sample post below is cut and past from a post from a friends timeline Lou Lyn, on facebook.



    "Tried to post this. . Blocked and the initial message I got was the News posting message Golden Age of Gaia.  .c 0 m.    So they are blocking everything.  Not just msm news sites.
    So currently listening to Gene on Hyperdrive and lots going on in Peru. . What's everyone's thoughts or what does anyone know about this ??? Could this be true ???
    Genes clip also below, it's a 3 hr clip, I'm 30 mins in, it's great , just talking about everything , no painful interruptions of advertising that Rick seems to be doing on B2T - anyone else noticed that ? I actually stopped on the Decodes half way through on that channel because it's overload on the Backstage , and all other advertising that he's now doing . .
    Update I'm an HR into link below . . It's brilliant"
    3
    Conspiracy theorists hang here. / The Problem Reaction Solution Paradigm (The Hegelian Dialectic)
    The Hegelian Dialectic is a framework to guide our thoughts and actions to a predetermined solution.
    • The government creates or exploits a problem blaming it on others
    • The people react by asking the government for help willing to give up their rights
    • The government offers the solution that was planned long before the crisis
    Historical Evidence of Problem Reaction Solution
    Nero Burnt Rome, Blamed it on the Christians and then Savagely Butchered Them. Nero Claudius Caesar 37-68 CE, University of Texas History, in 64 CE, a fire swept through Rome, burning for a week and destroying a large portion of the city. According to some sources, when he found that he did not have enough land to build his palace, he set fire to the city a second time.
    It is at this point that he is said to have "played his fiddle [lyre] while Rome burned." To avert suspicion, he blamed the fires on the Christians and proceeded to kill them in horrendous ways. Nero persecutes Christians in Rome, Rutgers University History, Neither human effort nor princely largesse nor divine appeasement was able to dispel the scandal that the fire which burned much of Rome in 64 CE was believed to have been commanded by the emperor Nero.
    So, to do away with the rumor, Nero substituted as culprits those who were commonly called "Christians," who were hated because of their absurdities. And he inflicted them with the most extraordinary punishments. The USS Maine Sank in Havana Harbor Launching the US into the Spanish American War.
    Sinking of the USS Maine Resulting in the Spanish American War
    US Navy Official Website, the Spanish American War 21 April to 13 August 1898, was a turning point in the history of the United States, signaling the country's emergence as a world power. The blowing up of the battleship USS Maine in Havana harbor on the evening of 15 February was a critical event on the road to that war. The U.S. Navy Department immediately formed a board of inquiry to determine the reason for Maine's destruction.
    When the Navy's verdict was announced, the American public reacted with predictable outrage. The destruction of Maine did not cause the U.S. to declare war on Spain, but it served as a catalyst, accelerating the approach to a diplomatic impasse. In addition, the sinking and deaths of U.S. sailors rallied American opinion more strongly behind armed intervention.
    The Resinking of the Battleship Maine, Historical Museum of Southern Florida, there is no mystery about the second sinking of the United States battleship Maine. It occurred on March 16, 1912, four miles outside Havana harbor, and was witnessed by thousands. They raised it and sank it in deep waters. Adolf Hitler was elected Chancellor President and then Burnt the Reichstag , German Parliament Building.
    He then declared Himself Furor Dictator and Promised Utopia. Hitler Declared Martial Law and Suspended All Basic Human Rights. Reichstag Fire, Encyclopedia Britannica Reichstag fire, burning of the Reichstag parliament building in Berlin, on the night of Feb. 27, 1933, a key event in the establishment of the Nazi dictatorship and widely believed to have been contrived by the newly formed Nazi government.
    To turn public opinion against its opponents and to assume emergency powers, his propaganda minister, Joseph Goebbels, is supposed to have devised the scheme. On Feb. 28, 1933, the day after the fire, Hitler's dictatorship began with the enactment of a decree "for the Protection of the People and the State," which dispensed with all constitutional protection of political, personal, and property rights.
    Holocaust Timeline The Nazification of Germany
    University of South Florida, on February 27 1933, the Reichstag building went up in flames. Nazis immediately claimed that this was the beginning of a Communist revolution. This fact leads many historians to believe that Nazis actually set, or help set the fire. Others believe that a deranged Dutch Communist set the fire. The issue has never been resolved.
    This incident prompted Hitler to convince Hindenburg to issue a Decree for the Protection of People and State that granted Nazis sweeping power to deal with the so called emergency. This laid the foundation for a police state. In 1962, the government wanted to change public opinion to create a pretext for war with Cuba.
    The Joint Chiefs of Staff created a plan that they named the "Northwoods Document", to commit a series of terrorist acts against America and blame it on the Cuban government. One of the scenarios included blowing up a civilian airplane. U.S. terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext, the Baltimore Sun, U.S. military leaders proposed in 1962 a secret plan to commit terrorist acts against Americans and blame Cuba to create a pretext for invasion.
    The ouster of Communist leader Fidel Castro, according to a new book about the National Security Agency. U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba - ABCNEWS.com, in the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba. The Actual Northwoods documents.
    Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962
    George Washington University, National Security Archive, this document, titled “Justification for U.S. Military Intervention in Cuba” was provided by the JCS to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962, as the key component of Northwoods. Bombing of Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.
    Other Examples of Problem Reaction Solution, the Stock Market Crash of 1929, The Federal Reserve was created in 1913. Evidence shows that it manipulated the market resulting in the greatest transfer of wealth to the 'Rich" in the history of the world. Then of course, we should never forget Septmber 11, 2001 - 911, which happened exactly 11 years, to the day, after George H W Bush made his New World Order Speach declaring the fifth objective.
    The UN Plot to Confiscate Civilian Weapons - Weapons Control, your Choices and your Responsibilities
    FAIR USE NOTICE: Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit
    for Research and Educational Purposes. Menu is at the Top, Sitemap is Here.
    Front-line New World Order Whistle Blowers - Learn the Faces
    Free Book in PDF - Steps Toward the Mark of the Beast

    4
    Conspiracy theorists hang here. / National Law Strikes Down COVID Measures in Canada
    National Law Strikes Down COVID Measures in Canada

    Tuesday, September 8, 2020

    Breaking News, September 8, 2020 National Law Strikes Down COVID Measures, Empowers Citizens to Resist; Officials Ordered to Stand Down or...
    Australia, Canada, New Zealand are Independent Nations? Legally Certainly Not!
    (Reader | Anonymous) A Video Every Canadian Must See
    SGTReport -- Unmasking the Queen's Corporate Fraud

    Breaking News, September 8, 2020

    National Law Strikes Down COVID Measures, Empowers Citizens to Resist; Officials Ordered to Stand Down or be Prosecuted in Common Law Courts

    http://youtu.be/66seIj5nN9g



    Canada:

    A Law was passed today by a council of citizens’ assemblies that struck down and criminalized all COVID measures requiring masking, distancing, quarantining, and vaccines.

    Under the new Public Safety Law NCCLA Order No. 09082020-A, any attempt to impose such measures on Canadians is considered a punishable crime and can result in the arrest and trial of the offender, regardless of their office. Canadians are encouraged to actively resist COVID measures, relying on the new law and local Common Law Sheriffs.

    The law was issued by the National Council of Common Law Assemblies (NCCLA), which unites more than forty such Assemblies across Canada within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Kanata. The NCCLA also issued a Stand Down Order to all government, police and health officials that requires that they not enforce COVID measures and comply with the new law.

    Copies of the NCCLA documents are attached to this release and are posted at www.republicofkanata.ca under “Media”.

    “The Council is far more democratic and representative of the will of Canadians than is Parliament or the courts, which are not only closed but have handed over their power to a handful of unaccountable bureaucrats” said Kevin Annett, a co-convener of the NCCLA.

    “In the absence of responsible government, we the people are defending ourselves from a corporate police state. It is now up to every Canadian to enforce this Law and use it to defend their children and their liberties and overturn this tyranny while they still can.”

    For more information contact the NCCLA at councilofassemblies@protonmail.com and see www.republicofkanata.ca. The Republic of Kanata (www.republicofkanata.ca) can be contacted at republicofkanata@gmail.com and its public voice can be heard every Sunday at 3 pm pacific, 6 pm eastern at www.bbsradio.com/herewestand.

    Issued September 8, 2020 by the NCCLA within the jurisdiction of the Republic of Kanata.
    ______________________________________________________

    Guest Posting

    If you wish to write and/or publish an article on Operation Disclosure all you need to do is send your entry to UniversalOm432Hz@gmail.com applying these following rules.

    The subject of your email entry should be: "Entry Post | (Title of your post) | Operation Disclosure"

    - Must be in text format
    - Proper Grammar
    - No foul language
    - Your signature/name/username at the top
    ______________________________________________________

    Newsletter

    If you wish to receive the daily Operation Disclosure Newsletter, you can subscribe here.
    ______________________________________________________

    Our mission at Operation Disclosure is to bring you important news events and raw intel from various sources focused on exposing the Deep State/Cabal and their downfall. We are also focused on disclosing our lost ancient origins and extraterrestrial contact.

    Disclaimer: All articles, videos, and images posted on Operation Disclosure were submitted by readers and/or handpicked by the site itself for informational and/or entertainment purposes. All statements, claims, views and opinions that appear on this site are always presented as unverified and should be discerned by the reader. We do not endorse any opinions expressed on this website and we do not support, represent or guarantee the completeness, truthfulness, accuracy, or reliability of any content posted on this website.

    Copyright © 2020 Operation Disclosure

    6
    Conspiracy theorists hang here. / Man goes on stabbing spree in Birmingham City, UK
    Man goes on stabbing spree in Birmingham City, UK
    BBC News
    07 Sep 2020, 03:28 GMT+10
    [img width=100%]https://cdn.bignewsnetwork.com/cus1599399209876.jpg[/img]
    • A knifeman who killed one man and wounded seven other people in a two-hour stabbing rampage across Birmingham city centre in the United Kingdom on Sunday is b ...
    • The first stabbing was in Constitution Hill at 00:30 BST and the killer moved south, apparently attacking at random, officers said.
    • The stabbings did not appear terrorism-related, gang-related or connected to disorder, West Midlands Police said.
    BIRMINGHAM, UK (BBC News): A knifeman who killed one man and wounded 7 other people in a two-hour stabbing rampage across Birmingham city centre in the United Kingdom on Sunday is being hunted by police.
    The first stabbing was in Constitution Hill at 00:30 BST and the killer moved south, apparently attacking at random, officers said.
    The stabbings did not appear terrorism-related, gang-related or connected to disorder, West Midlands Police said.
    The force urged anyone with CCTV or mobile footage to contact officers.
    Murder inquiry detectives said they were hunting a single suspect.
    Forensics officers at the scene
    Photo: Forensics officers at the scene of the stabbings (Credit: PA Media).
    One man died, another man and a woman suffered critical injuries and five other people were left with non-life-threatening injuries.
    Chief Supertendant Steve Graham said the attacker went on to stab people in Livery Street, Irving Street and finally in Hurst Street, where the city's Gay Village meets the Chinese Quarter, at about 02:20 BST.
    Police said there was no evidence the stabbings were a hate crime.
    The scene on Sunday morning
    Mr Graham said officers - some armed - remained across the city centre to reassure people.
    He added they had received a number of descriptions of the suspect but would not releasing any details at this time.
    Mr Graham said: "The events during the early hours of this morning are tragic, shocking and understandably frightening.
    "It does appear to be a random attack because we haven't found any links between the victims, either in their nature or in where they were socialising.
    "Please be assured that we are doing absolutely everything we can to find whoever was responsible and try to understand what exactly happened."
    A knife was recovered by the police from a drain following the stabbings
    Officers earlier found a knife in a drain but Mr Graham said it was "way too early" to say if it was connected to the case.
    "What I think it does suggest is the comprehensive nature of our inquiry - that already we've got people going down drains - we've got that level of detailed searches taking place," he said.
    Nathan Hudson, from West Midlands Ambulance Service, said 14 ambulances were sent and he was among 11 paramedic officers who were also sent to the scene.
    Prime Minister Boris Johnson thanked emergency services "who are working hard at the scene".
    Mr Johnson tweeted: "All my thoughts are with those affected by the terrible incident in Birmingham last night."
    map showing the locations of the stabbings
    David Nash, who was running the Village Inn in Hurst Street, said after a "normal night" he heard someone shout "stop him - he's just stabbed somebody" between 02:00 and 02:15.
    "The bars were starting to wind down as everybody finishes early since the reopening since Covid and the next thing we know the area is engulfed with armed response vehicles, normal police vehicles, police on foot, ambulances," he said.
    "They just came from absolutely nowhere and the area was full of them and then the police helicopter was up in the area obviously as they were searching for this person that they presume is the attacker."
    He said he then saw paramedics treating two people who seemed to have been stabbed.
    Mr Nash said police began clearing the area and he ensure staff at the bar and two others he helps run in the area got home safely in taxis.
    Witness Cara Curran, a club promoter working in the Arcadian Centre, said it had been busier during the evening than it had been at any time since the start of lockdown.
    A cordoned-off section of Hurst Street
    Ms Curran said she had finished her shift at about 00:30 BST and was drinking with colleagues when she heard a "loud bang and quite a lot of commotion".
    The streets in the area have already been closed to traffic due to coronavirus restrictions.
    A police cordon in Hurst Street, Birmingham
    Outside the cordoned-off area, much of the city centre, such as Birmingham's Bullring shopping centre and the Sealife Centre in Brindleyplace, is open as usual.
    The West Midlands Police and Crime Commissioner (PCC) David Jamieson said police would be working with the city council to see if there were "any further measures that need to be taken in the city centre", following the stabbings.
    A rise in violence was "almost inevitable" due to the pandemic, when people were suffering "pent-up feelings" and some were unsure of their futures, the Labour PCC said.

    7
    Conspiracy theorists hang here. / Kesgrave shooting: Gun found in schoolboy attack inquiry
    Kesgrave shooting: Gun found in schoolboy attack inquiry
    Published

    3 hours ago

    Police at the scene in Grange Farm, Kesgrave
    image captionPolice remain at the scene in Grange Farm, Kesgrave
    A "long-barrelled gun" has been recovered by police investigating the shooting of a 15-year-old boy on his way to school.
    The victim was shot at about 08:40 BST on the Grange Farm estate in Kesgrave, Suffolk, on Monday.
    The Year 11 Kesgrave High School pupil is in a critical condition and a 15-year-old boy is under arrest.
    Supt Kerry Cutler said police were not looking for anyone else in connection with the shooting.
    She said: "We have arrested an individual that we believe is involved in the incident and we also recovered a weapon."
    The suspect, who is said to be from the Woodbridge area, was arrested by armed police on suspicion of attempted murder.
    Detectives have been granted a superintendent's extension to detain him for questioning for an additional 12 hours.
    A police cordon at Friends Walk
    image captionA police cordon is in place at Friends Walk
    Supt Kerry Cutler
    image captionSupt Kerry Cutler said police were not looking for anyone else in connection with the shooting
    Suffolk Police said the two boys were known to each other and there was nothing to suggest the shooting was linked to organised criminality.
    The force said a boy was seen getting into a car following the attack.
    Officers added that a car had been seized and "a long-barrelled firearm was recovered from inside it".
    A temporary police station has been set up in Kesgrave and Supt Cutler said there was a large police presence, including officers from other forces.
    Police outside the high schoolimage copyrightPA Media
    image captionPolice said a large police presence would remain in the area
    Supt Cutler said: "Everybody is shocked, Kesgrave is on the outskirts of Ipswich, it is almost a semi-rural area, it's very much a residential area, this is not something we've seen in that area before and people will be impacted by it.
    "The investigation goes on and we're still appealing for anybody who saw anything or has any information to come forward."
    Suffolk Police said it was thought a single shot was fired on Friends Walk, off Through Jollys.
    Friends Walk remains closed off as police searches continue. Through Jollys and Ropes Drive reopened on Monday evening.
    The injured boy was airlifted to Addenbrooke's Hospital in Cambridge.
    A map showing the Grange Farm estate and the site of the shooting

    A neighbour, who did not want to be named, said the victim's parents tended to the boy after he had been shot.
    "They were very distraught, nothing like this ever happens in the estate," he said.
    Former paramedic Richard Bennett, who lives near the scene, said he heard the gunshot and thought "what on earth was going on".
    "As the day went on the tragedy unfolded, a 15-year-old boy had been shot, it's unbelievable," he said.
    Ellie, whose brother is in the same year as the victim at Kesgrave High, said local people were in "disbelief".
    She said: "I've grown up here and went to Kesgrave High and I had an absolutely blissful experience there, and this area in Kesgrave it's thought of as such a safe place, there's children everywhere, there's families everywhere, it's not somewhere you'd ever think this would happen."

    8
    Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / UK COMMON LAW,A LAWFUL REBELLION
    http://youtu.be/g9ZQT9_D7Rc

    http://youtu.be/uBU1_GbZ8P0?list=UU6O...
    without background music The video you are about to watch (and please watch all of it, it is very informative) details how our governments are not really what we think they are anymore. In fact, they are nothing more than corporations; not figuratively, but actually corporations.This makes sense when you think about it in relation to the Global Fascist Government that is being set up. For they would need to abolish the nation states in any legal manner they could, but they would also need to set up a governing body that extends beyond the limits of language and nationality, in order to accomplish that. So, like math is a universal language, the corporate model is a global one. If they are capable of setting up nations as corporations, then they will fit more neatly into their pyramid structure of control that is well on it's way to being created. Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

    9
    Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / practicallawfuldissent.com




    This website was created to present the obfuscated law which binds government to the rule of law.
    This law holds primacy over acts and statutes by sworn declaration, logic, and temporal precedence.
     This information is presented for your consideration. 
    Please kindly inform the administrator of any mistakes in logic or veracity.

     If you are finding your government and institutions have broken your trust, please read on.
    You are not alone.
    Treachery is afoot throughout the Commonwealth but the law is actually on your side.






    IRREFUTABLE TREASON

    This is the formal petition by the baron's committee resulting in the invocation of Article 61, Magna Carta 1215.  The barons presented Her Majesty the opportunity to prevent her agents committing Treason.  She gave Royal Assent to Her own usurpation.
     She betrayed the Commonwealth.
     
    Barons' Petition & Related Correspondence >>


    ARTICLE 61 INVOKED

    The Security Clause gives the land-owners a lawful process for petitioning the Crown should injustice be done by anyone representing the Crown.  We are all compelled to harmless disobedience until the injustice is properly resolved.
    The invocation was reported by
    Caroline Davies for the Telegraph.
    Telegraph: Peers Petition Queen on Europe >>


    MAGNA CARTA IS LAW

    Magna Carta is the mutual agreement to uphold equality and consent; no parliament has the authority to repeal or modify it.  The Crown's failure to rebuke the baron's invocation is
    tacit acknowledgement of Clause 61: everyone's right to equal justice in the Commonwealth.
    Magna Carta Society Research Paper >>
    What is Treason?
      • noun: an act of deliberate betrayal
      [/size][/list]

      What is Constitutional Law?
        • Law that limits the power of government or grants basic inalienable rights
        • Contractual agreement by which the Authority to govern is granted
        [/font][/size][/color][/list]

        Example of Treason from a file in our library (Exhibit C - 1993 Treason Charges, "Treason and The Validity of Magna Carta 1215"):
         Whereas it is an offence under Section 1 of the Treason Act 1795 “within the realm or without...to devise...constraint of the person of our sovereign...his heirs or successors.”


        On 7th February 1992 the Rt Hon Douglas Richard Hurd, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ... and the Rt Hon Francis Anthony Aylmer Maude ... did sign a Treaty of European Union at Maastricht in the Netherlands, according to Article 8 of which Her Majesty the Queen becomes a citizen of the European Union (confirmed by the Home Secretary in the House of Commons: Hansard 1st February 1993) therefore “subject to the duties imposed thereby”, subject to being arraigned in her own courts and being taxed under Article 192 of the integrated Treaty and thereby effectively deposed as the sovereign and placed in a position of suzerainty under the power of the “European Union”.

        Therefore the said Rt Hon Douglas Hurd and the said Rt Hon the Hon Francis Maude are guilty of treason.




        800 YEARS STRONG; 4 TIME CHAMPION:
        BRITISH CONSTITUTIONAL LAW

        Magna Carta 1215 is the Foundation of our Constitution across the Commonwealth.
        Our Monarch holds *our* inalienable Right of Sovereignty (self-determination) in trust and exercises *our* Authority over parliament to protect this Right.

        The "void and null" 1688 Bill of Rights transferred our Authority over parliament to parliament: High Treason.
        Any acts undermining Sovereignty or Rights under Magna Carta:
        Treason.

        10
        Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / 3 common law arguments against the unlawful (treasonous) use of EU arrest warran
        3 common law arguments against the unlawful (treasonous) use of EU arrest warrants and extradition orders:

        David Robinson·Friday, 31 May 2019·


        Common law argument against alleged English/British “courts” granting EU extradition Orders.
        1. The crown has been lawfully deposed of authority since Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta was invoked according to the correct protocols set out within Magna Carta 1215 on the 23rd March 2001. Therefore the alleged “judge” cannot be standing under his judicial Oath and has no authority to hear the matter or grant the EU extradition Order the right to deport ANY English/British subject.
        2. The EU has no authority under English/British common law over ANY English/British subject whatsoever, as laid out within the 1689 Bill of Rights;
        “And I do declare, That noforeign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentatehath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm: So help me God.”
        Furthermore, to allow any foreign entity jurisdiction over ANY English/British subject is in direct contravention of the Coronation Oath 1689, whereby the constitutional monarch “promises” to protect the laws of God and the rights and customs of the English/British peoples.
        3. Whereas High Treason HAS and IS being committed by present and successive governments of Great Britain, which is proven by the evidenced FACTS laid out within the document FCO 30/1048 and, which (said evidence) still remains within the public records office to this day, proves unequivocally that Britain was entered into a foreign usurping power (EU) and, which was done in the full knowledge of the FACTS by the quisling (imposter Prime Minister) Edward Heath in 1973. Therefore All EU treaties, Orders, directives etc are completely NULL AND VOID within this land and the commonwealth.

        11
        Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / links to lawful Dissent Video & Radio Interviews
        links to lawful Dissent Video & Radio Interviews

        David Robinson·Tuesday, 18 June 2019·


        Off the cuff talk at the Nottingham moot May 2017 David Robinson
        https://www.facebook.com/groups/practicallawfuldissent/permalink/1355130207905680/?pnref=story
        Seizing of the Town Hall Glastonbury October 2014
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0xd_w6On-o&fbclid=IwAR2yX7U4-h0Vd8JH6kGIBuuyz7o6ay9ve8E4uFRhx9D0lwW8M5zmrt_cQLg
        Assembly rooms Glastonbury talk on lawful rebellion 19th July 2014
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0gjP-pUoSA
        Common law court raido intervie David Robinson.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MP9RDKFp2Gc


        Public talk at Totness in 2018:
        https://www.facebook.com/DTDonline/videos/1584312841673702/UzpfSTEwMDAwMTAyNTA0Njc5NTpWSzoyNTAyNDMxMDYzMTc1NTgz/

        David Robinson spaking on the Daily Brexit show with Graham Moore (who spat his dummy out).
        https://www.facebook.com/dailybrexit/videos/365303673933346/UzpfSTEwMDAwMTAyNTA0Njc5NTpWSzoyNDU3MzkwNjY3Njc5NjIz/

        Video by William Keyte for the D&V Party on the Constitution:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?fbclid=IwAR22pObDvcMUhjcNKzEFuwdeHUYptkTDUQycbaJsc5-iGrAwIyQ6kyFvNNs&v=HJoB8xcP1l8&feature=youtu.be&app=desktop
        Consitutional crisis - The probelm and the Solution. Sandra Adams and David Robinson
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2G-e-jpWftg


        Lawful Dissent remedy explained David Robinson 2015:
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBOWN8sDc08&feature=share&fbclid=IwAR3VZhuj3llo67xrpgt6g3jcGx75zsGOs_4YKuNPOZB1Fis5F9QfWPWF-VU


        Latest video Interview with Everythin On The Table video chat.
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FSjzRIXFwcE&fbclid=IwAR2E3X9VIl_2si3ltZ-dTqJC5eHBNqkXaCmJGH5lAghbUkde3olJV8WgHYE

        12
        Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / CORONATION OATH ACT 1688
        CORONATION OATH ACT 1688

        David Robinson·Tuesday, 18 June 2019·


        NOTES:

        [The Coronation Oath was originally an agreement created between the people (by way of the feudal barons) and the King under the Christian faith, therefore a part of the permanent constitution as is Magna Carta 1215. They both predate Parliament and Parliament had NO LAWFUL AUTHORITY to reaffirm the Coronation Oath in statute form as an Act of Parliament in 1688, nor the Magna Carta in 1297, it was an act of treason against the sovereign people to do so. The original Coronation Oath was first created in written form by Henry 1st (see it at end of this file).

        Acts, Bills and Statutes therefore cannot become permanent unless accepted to become laws by Royal Assent, which allows them to become laws if they comply with the peoples constitution under the constraints of the original Coronation Oath (“I make free the Church of God" – i.e., according to the 10 commandments, laws of God – Common laws).

        Royal Assent must be provided solely by the King/Queen without the (treasonous) requirement to have the consent of parliament to do so (as the treasonous 1688/9 Bill of Rights states “Dispensing Power. That the pretended Power of Suspending of Laws or the Execution of Laws by Regall Authority without Consent of Parlyament is illegall.” ), and for any government created legislation (even after Royal Assent may have been granted) to become established as law it must also have been accepted by the people (jurors) within the common law jury nullification of Statute process, which is a safeguard for the people's rights in case of an overthrown King/Queen. This is what makes the people Sovereign as all laws are therefore by 'consent of the governed'. The Sovereign people have the last say in the matter.

        Therefore parliamentary legislation cannot be claimed to be constitutional law without both said conditions first being met. A well known Maxim in law states that “no parliament can bind its successors”. Parliamentary legislation cannot lawfully remain in existance without ultimately being consented to by the governed. Everything today is upside down by a very lengthy deception process. The Bill of Rights 1688/9 and the 1688 Coronation Oath Act are nothing more than 'unprocessed' piece of government legislation that have been treasonably binding successive parliaments and the King/Queen since their inception.

        Permanent constitutional laws bind us ALL forever, unless the people decide to change them (by improving them) within a constitutional convention of the people (which is different from a referendum as we know it to be today, because it is the people who decide the changes to be voted upon by the people not the government). The people are Sovereign.]


        1688 Coronation Oath Act: (as written in old English)
        “Oath heretofore framed in doubtful Words.
        Whereas by the Law and Ancient Usage of this Realme the Kings and Queens thereof have taken a Solemne Oath upon the Evangelists at Their respective Coronations to maintaine the Statutes Laws and Customs of the said Realme and all the People and Inhabitants thereof in their Spirituall and Civill Rights and Properties BUT forasmuch as the Oath itselfe on such Occasion Administred hath heretofore beene framed in doubtfull Words and Expressions with relation to ancient Laws and Constitutions at this time unknowne To the end therefore that One Uniforme Oath may be in all Times to come taken by the Kings and Queens of this Realme and to Them respectively Administred at the times of Their and every of Their Coronation.
        II. Oath hereafter mentioned to be administered,
        by the Archbishop of Canterbury, &c.
        May it please Your Majesties That it may be Enacted And bee it Enacted by the King and Queens most Excellent Majestyes by and with the Advice and Consent of the Lords Spirituall and Temporall and the Commons in this p[re]sent Parlyament Assembled and by the Authoritie of the same That the Oath herein Mentioned and hereafter Expressed shall and may be Administred to their most Excellent Majestyes King William and Queene Mary (whome God long preserve) at the time of Their Coronation in the presence of all Persons that shall be then and there present at the Solemnizeing thereof by the Archbishop of Canterbury or the Archbishop of Yorke or either of them or any other Bishop of this Realme whome the King's Majesty shall thereunto appoint and who shall be hereby thereunto respectively Authorized which Oath followeth and shall be Administred in this Manner That is to say,
        III. Form of Oath and Administration thereof.
        The Arch-Bishop or Bishop shall say,
        “Will You solemnely Promise and Sweare to Governe the People of this Kingdome of England and the Dominions thereto belonging according to the Statutes in Parlyament Agreed on and the Laws and Customs of the same?”

        The King and Queene shall say, “I solemnly Promise soe to doe”.

        Arch Bishop or Bishop, “Will You to Your power cause Law and Justice in Mercy to be Executed in all Your Judgements.”

        King and Queene, “I will”.

        Arch Bishop or Bishop. “Will You to the utmost of Your power Maintaine the Laws of God the true Profession of the Gospell and the Protestant Reformed Religion Established by Law? And will You Preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of this Realme and to the Churches committed to their Charge all such Rights and Priviledges as by Law doe or shall appertaine unto them or any of them.”

        King and Queene. “All this I Promise to doe”.

        After this the King and Queene laying His and Her Hand upon the Holy Gospells, shall say, King and Queene “The things which I have here before promised I will performe and Keepe Soe help me God”. Then the King and Queene shall kisse the Booke.
        IV. Oath to be administered to all future Kings and Queens.
        And bee it further Enacted That the said Oath shall be in like manner Administred to every King or Queene who shall Succeede to the Imperiall Crowne of this Realme at their respective Coronations by one of the Archbishops or Bishops of this Realme of England for the time being to be thereunto appointed by such King or Queene respectively and in the Presence of all Persons that shall be Attending Assisting or otherwise present at such their respective Coronations Any Law Statute or Usage to the contrary notwithstanding.


        THE WORDING USED IN 1953. NOTICE THE DIFFERENCES.

        The Queen's Coronation Oath, 1953
        Published 2 June 1953
        Quote
        Her Majesty The Queen; “The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.”
         
         
        In the Coronation ceremony of 2 June 1953, one of the highlights was when The Queen made her Coronation Oath (taken from the Order of Service for the Coronation).
        The Queen having returned to her Chair, (her Majesty having already on Tuesday, the 4th day of November, 1952, in the presence of the two Houses of Parliament, made and signed the Declaration prescribed by Act of Parliament, the Archbishop standing before her shall administer the Coronation Oath, first asking the Queen,
        “Madam, is your Majesty willing to take the Oath?”
        And the Queen answering,
        “I am willing.”
        The Archbishop shall minister these questions; and The Queen, having a book in her hands, shall answer each question severally as follows:
        Archbishop. “Will you solemnly promise and swear to govern the Peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, the Union of South Africa, Pakistan, and Ceylon, and of your Possessions and the other Territories to any of them belonging or pertaining, according to their respective laws and customs?”
        Queen.“I solemnly promise so to do.”
        Archbishop. “Will you to your power cause Law and Justice, in Mercy, to be executed in all your judgements?”
        Queen. “I will.”
        Archbishop. “Will you to the utmost of your power maintain the Laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel? Will you to the utmost of your power maintain in the United Kingdom the Protestant Reformed Religion established by law? Will you maintain and preserve inviolably the settlement of the Church of England, and the doctrine, worship, discipline, and government thereof, as by law established in England? And will you preserve unto the Bishops and Clergy of England, and to the Churches there committed to their charge, all such rights and privileges, as by law do or shall appertain to them or any of them?”
        Queen. “All this I promise to do.”
        Then the Queen arising out of her Chair, supported as before, the Sword of State being carried before her, shall go to the Altar, and make her solemn Oath in the sight of all the people to observe the premisses: laying her right hand upon the Holy Gospel in the great Bible (which was before carried in the procession and is now brought from the Altar by the Arch-bishop, and tendered to her as she kneels upon the steps), and saying these words:
        “The things which I have here before promised, I will perform and keep. So help me God.”
        Then the Queen shall kiss the Book and sign the Oath.
        The Queen having thus taken her Oath shall return again to her Chair, and the Bible shall be delivered to the Dean of Westminster.


        NOTE: Whereas the Kings Oath and constitutional duties had been treasonously usurped by parliament within the 1688/9 Bill of Rights and the 1688 Coronation Oath Act, the 1953 Coronation was but a charade, and deceptively to appear to “govern the Peoples” etc etc “according to their respective laws and customs”

        The “law established In England” as stated within the 1953 Coronation Oath primarily refer to the un-repealable Magna Carta 1215 and original Coronation Oath of Henry I. The 1953 Oath also involves all Commonwealth Nations which still have the (usurped) “Queen” as the head.

        The terminology “United Kingdom” is also a Corporation, the 1953 Oath is intentionally deceptive in its wording.

        The Office of Sovereign is vacant as the “Queen” had inherited a usurped office/throne. She has thus never been a Constitutional Monarch.
        Coronation of Henry I:
        [The oath at his coronation, which took place on 5th August 1100, was based on traditional texts but was the first to be actually written down. He undertook to reform abuses of his predecessor and to "restore the law…as my father made counsel with the barons". The Archbishop of Canterbury was in exile so the ceremony was performed by the Bishop of London. Both his queens had coronations (in 1100 and 1121 respectively).
        The Oath is as follows]:
        "Know that by the mercy of God and by the common counsel of the barons of England I have been crowned king of this realm. And because the kingdom has been oppressed by unjust exactions, being moved by reverence towards God and by the love I bear you all, I make free the Church of God … I abolish all the evil customs by which the kingdom of England has been unjustly oppressed."
        This Oath seems rather basic but it is stated that "I make free the Church of God"...which to my understanding means that his Oath was grounded under the 10 Commandments (the laws of God) and therefore the principles of the common law. The Common law constitution (including this original Coronation Oath) is all grounded under the Christian principles even today.

        13
        Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / 3 common law arguments against the unlawful (treasonous) use of EU arrest warran

        David Robinson·Tuesday, 18 June 2019·



        Common law argument against alleged English/British “courts” granting EU extradition Orders.

        1. The crown has been lawfully deposed of authority since Article 61 of the 1215 Magna Carta was invoked according to the correct protocols set out within Magna Carta 1215 on the 23rd March 2001. Therefore the alleged “judge” cannot be standing under his judicial Oath and has no authority to hear the matter or grant the EU extradition Order the right to deport ANY English/British subject.

        2. The EU has no authority under English/British common law over ANY English/British subject whatsoever, as laid out within the 1689 Bill of Rights;

        “And I do declare, That noforeign prince, person, prelate, state, or potentatehath, or ought to have any jurisdiction, power, superiority, pre-eminence, or authority, ecclesiastical or spiritual, within this realm: So help me God.”

        Furthermore, to allow any foreign entity jurisdiction over ANY English/British subject is in direct contravention of the Coronation Oath 1689, whereby the constitutional monarch “promises” to protect the laws of God and the rights and customs of the English/British peoples.

        3. Whereas High Treason HAS and IS being committed by present and successive governments of Great Britain, which is proven by the evidenced FACTS laid out within the document FCO 30/1048 and, which (said evidence) still remains within the public records office to this day, proves unequivocally that Britain was entered into a foreign usurping power (EU) and, which was done in the full knowledge of the FACTS by the quisling (imposter Prime Minister) Edward Heath in 1973. Therefore All EU treaties, Orders, directives etc are completely NULL AND VOID within this land and the commonwealth.

        15
        Practical Lawful Dissent U.K. Canada And Commonwealth / QUICK GUIDE OF HOW TO USE THE LAWFUL DISSENT PROCESS (taken from the main Layman

        David Robinson·Sunday, 13 October 2019·


        QUICK GUIDE OF HOW TO USE THE LAWFUL DISSENT PROCESS (taken from the main Layman’s Guide to Lawful Dissent).
        David Robinson·Tuesday, 3 September 2019·
        QUICK GUIDE (With links to Notices).

        [All links are to examples of Notices that have been used....just copy and paste onto a word doc or download from the files and adjust them to fit your circumstances....its not difficult to do and it is educational to do it that way...templates are not as good as individually created Notices....you want them to know that you know what you are talking about, then they will be less likely to challenge you beyond the point of no return (treason)].

        STEP 1. Declare your standing in lawful dissent (remove the presumption of your consent). This is done either by serving a Notice of conditional acceptance onto the person making demands on you and declaring your standing under Article 61 or, if nobody is making any demand on you at the time, a Notice of lawful objection to the local police chief inspector; declaring your standing by Oath to the Committee of the Barons (which is actually to the Common Law Constitution and not the Barons themselves). An Oath of Allegiance does not need to be sent to a baron, simply create one and have three people sign it as witnesses and it if you prefer and it becomes a legal instrument, which covers you from allegations of acting in outlawry (unlawfully).

        Oath of Allegiance to Lord Craigmyle (You do not need to send an Oath to a baron):

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/example-of-an-oath-of-allegiance-to-the-barons-and-declaration-of-intent/554484051303637/

        Oath of Allegiance to Lord Craigmyle: Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/oath-of-allegiance-to-send-to-a-baron-copy-and-paste-template/2511963255555697/

        Oath of Allegiance NOT to send to a baron: Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/oath-of-allegiance-not-sent-to-a-baron-copy-and-paste-template/2511955585556464/

        NOTICE OF LAWFUL OBJECTION (POLICE CHIEF INSPECTOR):

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-lawful-objection-
        declaring-your-standing-in-law-police/2503741199711236/

        NOTICE OF LAWFUL OBJECTION (POLICE CHIEF INSPECTOR): Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-lawful-objection-declaring-your-standing-in-law-police-copy-and-paste-/2511990068886349


        NOTICE OF LAWFUL OBJECTION (CROWN AGENTS):
        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-lawful-objection/2491256294293060/

        NOTICE OF LAWFUL OBJECTION (CROWN AGENTS): Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-lawful-objection-to-any-crown-agent-copy-and-paste-template/2511970435554979/



        STEP 2. Conditionally accept any demands made upon you whilst putting them on notice that article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 is in effect today, and that they must provide evidence in substance (meaning evidence provided in document form) that article 61 is no longer in effect (which cannot be done) therefore, the crown (courts, police, tax offices, councils etc) have no authority to make whatever demand is being made against you, so they obviously cannot provide evidence to the contrary;

        NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE:

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-conditional-acceptance/2491380054280684/

        NOTICE OF CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE: Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-conditional-acceptance-copy-and-paste-template/2512042828881073/


        STEP 3. Serve a Notice of default and opportunity to cure if the first conditional acceptance Notice has been ignored or, your question(s) has/have been ignored. We do this to remain in honour which is an important part of the process (you can serve a second Notice of default and opportunity to cure to give them yet another chance to respond to your first and second Notice if you like).

        NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE:

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/example-of-a-notice-of-default-and-opportunity-to-cure/2491113460974010/

        NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND OPPORTUNITY TO CURE: Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-default-and-opportunity-to-cure-copy-and-paste-template/2512082615543761/


        STEP 4. Serve the Notice of Default. You are stating that they are now in default and dishonour, and have agreed by either tacit consent (ignoring you) or by lack of substance (providing no written evidence of them having authority to make demands upon you), that they have no legal/lawful claim against you.... goodbye;

        NOTICE OF DEFAULT:
        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/example-of-a-notice-of-default/2491134424305247/

        NOTICE OF DEFAULT: Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-default-copy-and-paste-template/2512089455543077/


        STEP 5. If/when they persist serve a ‘Notice of Misprision of Treason’ (or coercion to aid and abet High Treason to be more compelling) on any persistent agent (making him/her personally liable for their actions under penalty of perjury). By evidencing acts of High Treason that have and are being committed today, the agent would then have to decide whether or not to commit high treason in order to pursue you further. If they are in the know, like so called “judges”, and the higher echelons of the police service etc, you will very unlikely hear from them again except for them to write that “your points have been noted” in an attempt not to tacitly consent to your points of law, which they do anyway when they ignore the evidence provided, and the summons or other demand for payment or whatever may invariably not be pursued, which today they more than likely will be regardless;

        NOTICE OF MISPRISION OF TREASON AND INTENT:

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-understanding-of-misprision-of-treason/2491191827632840/

        NOTICE OF COERCION TO AID AND ABET HIGH TREASON: Template.
        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-of-coercion-to-aid-and-abet-high-treason-misprision-of-treason-copy-and-p/2512099978875358/

        STEP 6. Finally serve a ‘Notice To Stop if required, which will likely bring another process being started against the police if/when they refuse to act).

        Report any continued harassment, coercion or attempt of extortion etc to the police. Demand an investigation and a crime reference number, and remind them of their Oath of office. You will need three witnesses to accompany you to the police station to make it stick, or record it covertly. The police according to their warrant card and Oath MUST investigate ALL allegations of crime they have a ‘duty of care’ to do so, be assertive but not aggressive.

        Within article 61 of Magna Carta 1215 it states that no-one will be restrained from declaring their allegiance to the committee of the barons, and that anyone unwilling to stand with them (and us at this time) must be compelled to do so. Thus we all have a duty under the law to peacefully dissent against the crown and also to “compel” others to declare their allegiance to the Constitution via the barons committee also, including of course the police.

        You can also serve extra Notices on anyone ignoring the Treason Notice with a NOTICE TO STOP...this Notice can be as threatening as you like....keeping it clean (not using swear words) but use threatening language and inform them that the people are now waking up in their droves, and that soon we will collectively reassert the common law within real courts of law and, that you will pursue them with the evidence that you have collected against them to bring them to justice for their treachery...remind them that they are committing High Treason in full knowledge of the facts and, that ignorance is no defence in law.

        NOTICE TO STOP:

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-to-stop/2491218367630186/

        NOTICE TO STOP: Template.

        https://www.facebook.com/notes/practical-lawful-dissent/notice-to-stop-copy-and-paste-template/2512130755538947/

        Most people don’t realize that they each have a lawful duty by 'royal command' to dissent against a regime that does not abide by the peoples law (constitution).

        To understand this concept, which seems to be a contradiction in terms for some folk, that we each have a lawful duty by royal command to distress the crown, which is commanded by the crown! (a constitutional monarch, especially whilst that position has been treasonously usurped).

        First it needs to be understood that Magna Carta 1215 was a peace treaty and contract, which contained equal consideration like all other treaties and contracts do. We are duty bound to report treason to the police of course, and each and every one of us is commanded (by law) to bring the crown and its agents to order, to see sense as it were, and/or to protect a ‘constitutional’ monarch from a covert takeover by the globalists, but also not to harm the monarch or its heirs or successors physically whilst doing so. By doing this we the people are protecting our rights and sovereignty, which the monarch is supposed to be able to protect.

        Knowledge is power but unity is the key. Our ancient ancestors understood that, which is why standing under Article 61 is compulsory for us all today, for unity is required to bring down an institutionalised despotic regime, and we are all imbued with the power (by law) of our sovereign status since the security clause was invoked in 2001.